Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2025

Performance and ergonomics of automated versus manual validation for AR-supervised industrial operations

Résumé

Validation tasks in AR-supervised environments can be automated to improve process quality in industrial contexts. However, human-centered approaches urge us to study the impact of such methods on operator's acceptance. The paper presents a study on 24 participants to compare 4 modalities of validation of operations. SCRAM, a WebXR application is developed to compare validation tasks on 2 types of devices: tablets and HMDs. All scenarios are tested with an assembly use case through performance, task load, usability and acceptance criteria. Result show significant differences regarding the choice of the device but do not highlight any difference between scenarios with automated validation of operations and scenarios with manual validation.

Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

Identifiants

Citer

Gaspard Laouénan, Jean-Yves Didier, Paul-Eric Dossou. Performance and ergonomics of automated versus manual validation for AR-supervised industrial operations. 32nd IEEE Conference On Virtual Reality And 3d User Interfaces (VR 2025), IEEE Computer society; Visualization and Graphics Technical Committee, Mar 2025, Saint-Malo, France. pp.135--145, ⟨10.1109/VR59515.2025.00038⟩. ⟨hal-04983843⟩
294 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

  • More